Hi Olof,

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 12:27 AM Olof Johansson <o...@lixom.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 02:03:54PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC defconfig updates for v4.19.

> > * Set CONFIG_LOCALVERSION to shmobile_defconfig
> >
> >   This follows what appears to be common practice in defconfigs
> >   and allows easier management of the kernel flavour at run-time.
>
> I replied to the multi-versions of defconfig for this patch -- it's not a good
> way to solve the problem of detecting config at runtime. Please drop this
> patch. See:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAOesGMgkU6yBRpAsED2fPyuAo9Tc=yprndgdkmbvrc+0783...@mail.gmail.com/

One more comment to the rescue: it does complicate regression testing,
as the test software running on the DUT has no easy way to distinguish
between e.g. shmobile_defconfig and multi_v7_defconfig (and whatever
other board-specific configs I use for testing).
Yes, I can have these as local patches in my tree (of course I already have ;-),
but when bisecting, I have to remember to (un)apply them in every step.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to