Hi, > So, we're handling all of the interrupts fine, but every time we > handle an ATL interrupt, it says that it's not handled, and we get > the "nobody cared" message. > Oops. I wonder, why I did never get one of those...
> Thanks for your feedback and insight. It sure helped me find this > problem. Could you fix your patch as well? > Yes, I'll do that. And I will add another delay macro to the read/write primitives that can be used on hardware that doesn't allow for adjusting the memory timing to meet the requirements of the chip. When this delay macro is undefined insw/outsw will be used, with the macro defined (even if empty) a loop around read_data16/write_data16 will be used like in your case. Lothar Wassmann ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
