On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 16:27 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 10:06 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:48 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > On 21 November 2012 21:32, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> > > > wrote: > > > > atom-pc should probably be using the 3.4 kernel, but that's a > > > > question for Darren/Tom/Nitin (so I've added them to the cc), since > > > > there may be a reason (with respect to graphics) as to why it is on > > > > 3.0. > > > > > > Ping Darren/Tom/Nitin. > > > > > > atom-pc is certainly lagging behind by still being on 3.0, and I can't > > > see any reason why we'd want to stick with 3.0 for graphics. In fact > > > as the most common graphics driver used on atom-pc is a i965 we want a > > > modern kernel as that is where the development is. > > > > > > > I don't know of any technical reason for it to still be at 3.0. > > > > Until recently all of the 'core machines' were at 3.0 and probably the > > assumption was that whoever upgraded those in the past would also be > > upgrading atom-pc - has that changed?. > > > > So who does own the core machines and if that doesn't cover atom-pc, > > then who owns that? > > As I understood it, WR owns the non-IA core machines, you (as in the > Intel team) own the IA ones, namely atom-pc. >
OK, yeah, I anyway had just assumed it was WR for the core machines: commit f08b8c96402cd2b1e939f1babbc002d630fbf274 Author: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> Date: Fri Aug 19 00:37:08 2011 -0400 meta-yocto: atom-pc/mpc8315e-rdb change preferred version to 3.0 Updating two more yocto hardware reference platforms to use the 3.0 kernel by default. But I see that Darren had done the previous upgrade: commit 622fb696a6fc9eab991a5f412eb28e2ff949a32b Author: Darren Hart <dvh...@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri May 6 12:12:50 2011 -0700 atom-pc: use linux-yocto (2.6.37) kernel Tested boot, network, sato desktop, amixer, and audio playback on a Toshiba NB305 netbook. And it does make sense for Intel to own the atom-pc, it's just never been clearly stated unless I missed the discussion. Tom > Cheers, > > Richard > _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto