On 5/13/14, 10:06, "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kam...@intel.com> wrote:
>Hi Bruce, > As most of the BSPs from meta-intel layer are using the standard/base >for KBRANCH, these kernel branches from the linux-yocto-3.14 repository >are not needed anymore, and can be deleted to reduce the branch count. > >Darren, Tom, > Do you see any of these branches used anywhere else? > >standard/common-pc-64/chiefriver >standard/common-pc-64/crystalforest >standard/common-pc-64/jasperforest >standard/common-pc-64/mohonpeak >standard/common-pc-64/rangeley >standard/common-pc-64/romley >standard/common-pc-64/sugarbay >standard/common-pc/atom-pc >standard/crownbay >standard/emenlow >standard/fri2 >standard/preempt-rt/base Let's not prune preempt-rt/base - we should instead be adding the linux-yocto-rt recipe for 3.14! Bruce, there is a preempt-rt 3.14.3-rt5 available. I don't see it in the linux-yoct 3.14 repository. Am I missing it - are you waiting for someone to send the patch? This is *way* late to be doing this.... But we really should have preempt-rt at least in the tree :-( Sadly, I just haven't had time to do it unfortunately, but there is enough interest out there that we really should be making this part of our release criteria going forward. If it just builds.... Should we add the recipe and include it? >standard/sys940x >standard/tiny/fri2 > >Bruce, > If there is no objection you can proceed with deleting of these >branches from the L-Y v3.14 kernel repository. >Thanks, >Nitin > > -- Darren Hart Open Source Technology Center darren.h...@intel.com Intel Corporation -- _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto