From: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>

commit da028469ba173e9c634b6ecf80bb0c69c7d1024d upstream

worker_idr has the iteration (iterating for attached workers) and
worker ID duties. These two duties don't have to be tied together. We
can separate them and use a list for tracking attached workers and
iteration.

Before this separation, it wasn't possible to add rescuer workers to
worker_idr due to rescuer workers couldn't allocate ID dynamically
because ID-allocation depends on memory-allocation, which rescuer
can't depend on.

After separation, we can easily add the rescuer workers to the list for
iteration without any memory-allocation. It is required when we attach
the rescuer worker to the pool in later patch.

tj: Minor description updates.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.c...@windriver.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c          |   28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 kernel/workqueue_internal.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 24fdc78..aac8eb2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ struct worker_pool {
        /* see manage_workers() for details on the two manager mutexes */
        struct mutex            manager_arb;    /* manager arbitration */
        struct mutex            manager_mutex;  /* manager exclusion */
-       struct idr              worker_idr;     /* M: worker IDs and iteration 
*/
+       struct idr              worker_idr;     /* M: worker IDs */
+       struct list_head        workers;        /* M: attached workers */
        struct completion       *detach_completion; /* all workers detached */
 
        struct workqueue_attrs  *attrs;         /* I: worker attributes */
@@ -363,7 +364,6 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
 /**
  * for_each_pool_worker - iterate through all workers of a worker_pool
  * @worker: iteration cursor
- * @wi: integer used for iteration
  * @pool: worker_pool to iterate workers of
  *
  * This must be called with @pool->manager_mutex.
@@ -371,8 +371,8 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
  * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
  * ignored.
  */
-#define for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)                         \
-       idr_for_each_entry(&(pool)->worker_idr, (worker), (wi))         \
+#define for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)                             \
+       list_for_each_entry((worker), &(pool)->workers, node)           \
                if (({ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); false; })) { 
} \
                else
 
@@ -1667,6 +1667,7 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
        if (worker) {
                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->entry);
                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->scheduled);
+               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->node);
                /* on creation a worker is in !idle && prep state */
                worker->flags = WORKER_PREP;
        }
@@ -1689,7 +1690,8 @@ static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker,
 
        mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
        idr_remove(&pool->worker_idr, worker->id);
-       if (idr_is_empty(&pool->worker_idr))
+       list_del(&worker->node);
+       if (list_empty(&pool->workers))
                detach_completion = pool->detach_completion;
        mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 
@@ -1765,6 +1767,8 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool 
*pool)
 
        /* successful, commit the pointer to idr */
        idr_replace(&pool->worker_idr, worker, worker->id);
+       /* successful, attach the worker to the pool */
+       list_add_tail(&worker->node, &pool->workers);
 
        return worker;
 
@@ -3477,6 +3481,7 @@ static int init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
        mutex_init(&pool->manager_arb);
        mutex_init(&pool->manager_mutex);
        idr_init(&pool->worker_idr);
+       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->workers);
 
        INIT_HLIST_NODE(&pool->hash_node);
        pool->refcnt = 1;
@@ -3542,7 +3547,7 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
        spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
        mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
-       if (!idr_is_empty(&pool->worker_idr))
+       if (!list_empty(&pool->workers))
                pool->detach_completion = &detach_completion;
        mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 
@@ -4531,7 +4536,6 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
        int cpu = smp_processor_id();
        struct worker_pool *pool;
        struct worker *worker;
-       int wi;
 
        for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
                WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());
@@ -4546,7 +4550,7 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
                 * before the last CPU down must be on the cpu.  After
                 * this, they may become diasporas.
                 */
-               for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
+               for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
                        worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
 
                pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
@@ -4592,7 +4596,6 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
        struct worker *worker;
-       int wi;
 
        lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
 
@@ -4603,13 +4606,13 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
         * of all workers first and then clear UNBOUND.  As we're called
         * from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail.
         */
-       for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
+       for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
                WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
                                                  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
 
        spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
-       for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool) {
+       for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
                unsigned int worker_flags = worker->flags;
 
                /*
@@ -4661,7 +4664,6 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct 
worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
 {
        static cpumask_t cpumask;
        struct worker *worker;
-       int wi;
 
        lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
 
@@ -4675,7 +4677,7 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct 
worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
                return;
 
        /* as we're called from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail */
-       for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
+       for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
                WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
                                                  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
 }
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
index 7e2204d..8888e06 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ struct worker {
        struct task_struct      *task;          /* I: worker task */
        struct worker_pool      *pool;          /* I: the associated pool */
                                                /* L: for rescuers */
+       struct list_head        node;           /* M: anchored at pool->workers 
*/
+                                               /* M: runs through worker->node 
*/
 
        unsigned long           last_active;    /* L: last active timestamp */
        unsigned int            flags;          /* X: flags */
-- 
1.7.10.4

-- 
_______________________________________________
linux-yocto mailing list
linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto

Reply via email to