On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:02 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2017-02-15 8:37 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 09:36 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On 2017-02-08 05:07 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > >>> This should be applicable to all branches which have the tpm.cfg file > >>> that I submitted recently. Sorry for missing the warning earlier - I > >>> must have mentally blocked it out instead of actually reading it :-/ > >> > >> No worries :D > >> > >> I've merged these changes. > > > > Can this also be included into linux-intel-4.9.bb? Do you need a patch > > for meta-intel or were you going to do that anyway? > > I assumed that Saul or Cal would pick up that part. I can copy them > when I do the SRCREV bumps for core, since that way it'll show up on > their radar.
Didn't you send those SRCREV bumps already yesterday ("[OE-core] [PATCH 06/11] linux-yocto/4.8/4.9: fix tpm.cfg and add dm-verity")? ;-} > I don't object to spinning a patch for other layers, but if someone > has a closer eye on the targets, it is better. Just wanted to know. It wasn't clear to me who maintains what (kernel cache, OE-core, meta-intel) and how the collaboration works in practice. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto