On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:41:03PM -0500, Chris Bagwell wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> >  configure.ac |    2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> I also put a release.sh in input-wacom.  Its a copy of the
>> xf86-input-wacom one and uploaded both versions.  So before next RC or
>> official release, we'll need a patch for that as well.
>
> once the other release.sh is fixed for module support, we should remove the
> one in input-wacom. expecting a git checkout of xf86-input-wacom for the
> release script isn't a big deal and I'd rather have only one script
> across three modules.

One script covers all modules is a good idea. Should we add wdaemon to
the group, or do we still care about wdaemon?

When you update the repos, please update the corresponding wiki pages
as well. Talking about wiki, where do you plan to move the pages when
sf stops supporting MediaWiki?

Ping

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Linuxwacom-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel

Reply via email to