mgorny added a comment. In D100191#2689489 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191#2689489>, @labath wrote:
> We should also start thinking about tests. I suppose the smallest piece of > functionality that could be usefully tested (with a lldb-server test) is > debugging a process that forks, stopping after the fork, and detaching from > the child. Shall we try making that work first? How about using a `MockProcess` to unittest server's behavior wrt getting `NewSubprocess()` and `Detach()` calls? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100191 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
