github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp --
llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp
b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp
index ac8532d34..8410f47fd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp
@@ -4109,7 +4109,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_CTPOP(SDNode *N,
SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi) {
TargetLowering::MakeLibCallOptions CallOptions;
EVT IntVT =
EVT::getIntegerVT(*DAG.getContext(), DAG.getLibInfo().getIntSize());
- SDValue Res = TLI.makeLibCall(DAG, LCImpl, IntVT, Op, CallOptions,
DL).first;
+ SDValue Res =
+ TLI.makeLibCall(DAG, LCImpl, IntVT, Op, CallOptions, DL).first;
SplitInteger(DAG.getSExtOrTrunc(Res, DL, VT), Lo, Hi);
return;
}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170585
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
