------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EpW3eD/3MnJAA/cosFAA/e0EolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Mainstream Weekly (India)
May 7, 2005


SOCIAL SECURITY FOR UNORGANISED WORKERS

Bharat Dogra

After coming to Delhi from Chhattarpur (Madhya Pradesh) Mohan settled 
in Bannuwal Nagar JJ Colony and started working as a mason. About 
five years back he had an accident in which his leg was seriously 
injured. This required long-term treatment in the course of which an 
iron rod had to be inserted to enable him to walk. The contractor 
paid him a subsistence wage for some time and then left him to his 
own fate. Mohan worked as a vendor for some time but this work 
collapsed recently, partly because of the fact that he walks very 
slowly with the help of a stick. The accident has permanently 
disabled Mohan from working as a mason. Now without any work on his 
hands and little chance of finding any in future, Mohan faces a very 
grim future.
There are a very large number of workers like Mohan in the 
unorganised sector who do not have access to any form of social 
security to help them survive in difficult times.
One of the gravest shortcomings of labour welfare in India has been 
that while as many as 90 per cent of the workers are in the 
unorganised sector, most of the welfare laws have not been applicable 
to them. In some cases this happened because large sections of the 
unorganised sector workers were outside the purview of these laws, 
and in other cases because in practice the laws could not be applied 
to unorganised sector workers.
Enacting protective umbrella legislation which can apply to all 
sections of unorganised workers is not easy as a wide range of works 
and occupations have to be covered. Some of these leading occupations 
are those of agricultural workers, forest workers, rickshaw pullers, 
vendors, domestic workers, home based workers, construction workers, 
scavengers and rag pickers, wholesale/retail trade workers and 
numerous others. Nevertheless, it is important to have a 
comprehensive law that provides at least some protection for all 
unorganised workers as the alternative is to have separate laws for 
too many categories of workers-a task which is even more complicated 
and time-consuming.
As welfare and social security laws will lose all credibility and 
utility if the overwhelming majority of workers do not derive any 
benefits from them, various reports of the Labour Ministry have been 
emphasising the need for comprehensive protective legislation for the 
unorganised sector workers; but still this work of crucial 
significance has been delayed for too long. Finally, the Second 
National Commission on Labour (NCL) was asked, as perhaps its most 
significant task, to propose an umbrella type legislation for workers 
in the unorganised sector. This legislation and the system that is to 
be built around it, the Commission was told, should assure at least a 
minimum protection and welfare to workers in the unorganised sector.
The NCL pointed out that out of the total work force of 314 million, 
286 million are main workers. Out of the 286 million main workers, 
259 million are in the unorganised sector.
The NLC Report (year 2000) said in its recommendations:
The way to extend legal protection to the employment and vocations in 
the unorganised sector is not by legislating separately for each 
employment or vocation. This will only multiply the number of laws 
when one of our goals is to simplify and reduce the number of 
existing laws. It is, therefore, logical and wise to enact an 
umbrella type of law for the unorganised sector which would guarantee 
a minimum of protection and welfare to all workers in the unorganised 
sector, and would leave it open to the Government to bring in special 
laws for different employments or sub-sectors if experience indicates 
the need for it, provided that the sub-sectoral laws do not take away 
any of the basic rights or the access to social security that the 
umbrella legislation provides. Such an arrangement will give full 
respect to the federal nature of our Constitution as well as the 
different needs of diverse groups of workers.
According to the NCL the social security measures for the unorganised 
workers should include: healthcare, maternity and early childcare, 
provident fund benefits, family benefits, amenities/benefits 
including housing, drinking water, sanitation, etc., compensation for 
employment injury benefits (including invalidity benefits and 
survivor's or dependent's benefits), retirement and post-retirement 
benefits (gratuity, pension and family pension). Besides these, there 
should be schemes, either independent or in association with the 
government, welfare bodies, NGOs and social organisations, for the 
upgradation of skills and the education of workers, and for the 
elimination of child labour and forced labour.
After holding discussions with a large number of concerned persons 
and considering the recommendations of a study group on this issue, 
the NLC suggested a draft of this legislation in which apex boards 
for the unorganised sector workers will be created in all States by 
the respective State governments. This apex board in consultation 
with the State Government will create State Welfare Boards for 
various categories of workers. The State Board in consultation with 
district panchayats will also constitute District Boards.
In this draft the Worker Facilitation Centres (WFCs) are the local 
centres of activities of the Board coordinated by the respective 
District Boards. The District Board in consultation with local 
panchayats will constitute them. The WFCs will work in panchayats and 
areas of workers' concentration. Workers will be enrolled by the WFC 
and the welfare benefits to them will also be provided by the WFCs.
The Central and State Boards will raise funds by way of contribution, 
cess, assistance, grant from the government through budget allocation 
or donations from employment providers, private sector, workers and 
other legally permitted sources.
w
Following the submission of the report of the NLC, the Ministry of 
Labour organised a National Seminar on Unorganised Sector Labour in 
November 2002. This seminar set up a technical group on the 
legislative aspects. According to the recommendations of the 
Technical Group on Umbrella Legislation for the Unorganised Sector,
The approach of the legislation both for the Unorganised Sector and 
the Agricultural workers should not merely be welfare oriented but 
also provide for regulation of employment, provision of minimum 
employment earnings guarantee wherever practicable, as well as a role 
of the workers for proper enforcement of the law and the schemes. 
Attempts must be made to ensure workers participation in formulation 
and implementation of the scheme.
The role of the Central Government should be generally to provide 
leadership and coordination. The scheme should be generally operated 
at the State and the Union Territory levels. The Central Government 
has to play an important role in the collection of funds and the 
disbursement, auditing of the funds through various State Boards.
At the time of the NDA Government the Union Ministry of Labour had 
circulated various revised versions of the draft of the legislation 
for unorganised workers, but these left much to be desired. Meanwhile 
several labour and legal activists, who had already spearheaded a 
campaign for the construction workers' legal rights, formed the 
National Campaign Committee for Unorganised Sector Workers with 
Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer as its Chairman. This Committee had made a 
representation before the NLC which attracted a lot of attention. A 
critique of the NDA Government's draft by the National Campaign 
Committee for unorganised Sector Workers (NCC-USW) said that 
significant provisions to ensure socio-economic security to workers 
suggested by the NCL as well as the Technical Committee had been 
ignored in these drafts. This review said:
The Bill must clearly contain the elements of social security and 
welfare that will be provided at the minimum level. Besides, the Bill 
must ensure provisions for regulation of employment and minimum 
guarantee of earning calculated on the principle of need based 
minimum wage.
The earlier legislation based on Welfare Boards was enacted for only 
one category of the unorganised sector, mainly construction workers. 
But apart from the fact that these were weak laws, their 
implementation has also been tardy.
In 1996, after a long delay, two important legislations were passed 
by Parliament for the construction workers-the Building and 
Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of 
Service) Act, 1996 and the Building and Other Construction Workers 
Welfare Cess Act, 1996. These legislations came only after a 
12-year-long sustained campaign by the National Campaign Committee 
for Construction Labour (NCC-CL) in which various central trade 
unions campaigned unitedly. Among other things, these legislations 
provide for a cess to be collected on all new construction activity 
at the rate of one to two per cent of the total budget of the 
construction being taken up. This amount has to be deposited with the 
Construction Workers' Welfare Board for the many-sided welfare 
activities of construction workers including pension, assistance in 
case of accident, housing loan, insurance scheme, maternity benefits, 
education of children etc.
These central acts have to be implemented by the governments of every 
State and Union Territory. Even after almost eight years these have 
been implemented only in Kerala, Tamil Nadu (which sought an 
exemption and implemented its earlier law), Delhi, Pondichery, Madhya 
Pradesh and Gujarat. It is clear that if the rules of these 
legislations had been framed and its implementation had started in 
the true spirit within almost one year of the passing of these 
legislations, then during the last six years or so billions of rupees 
would have become available for the welfare of workers. This rightful 
share of workers, provided for them by Parliament eight years back, 
has been held back from them because of avoidable delays in the 
implementation of these legislations.
Keeping in view this poor record of the implementation of 
legislations for the construction workers, it is important that when 
a legislation is enacted for all unorganised sector workers, efforts 
are also made to promote the unity of the unorganised workers so that 
the legislation is implemented in the proper spirit. The hopes and 
aspirations of as many as 260 million workers (as per the estimates 
provided in the NLC Report) are tied up with the proposed umbrella 
type legislation for the unorganised sector workers.

_________________________________

Labour Notes South Asia (LNSA):
An informal archive and mailing list for trade
unionists and labour activists based in or
working on South asia.

LNSA Mailing List:
Labour Notes South Asia
To subscribe send a blank message to:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

LNSA Web site:
groups.yahoo.com/group/lnsa/

Run by The South Asia Citizens Web
www.sacw.net
_________________________________






To join the Labour Notes South Asia Mailing List, send a blank message to:   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lnsa/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to