Jochen,
Please send me your new version. I will immediately add it in the contribs/ directory
of log4j. Since
At 00:20 14.03.2001 +0100, Jochen Hiller wrote:
>Greg,
>
>I just did some work to support JSR 047 (hacked partial JSR implementation). We use
>now the java.util.logging API in some projects, but the underlying implementation is
>completely based on log4j. We use it in EJB and JSP environments. Works fine for JDK
>1.2.2, but some problems with JDK 1.3, as java.* namespace is reserved for java core
>packages only.
>
>Workaround: include the jar files in the bootclasspath (uuh, ugly), or change the
>security policy (do you know how ?)
>
>I sent one (older) copy of log4j-loggingapi to Ceki, but I would not propose it to
>include in the current log4j distribution due to these restrictions (and other
>deployment issues with the JSR jar).
>
>But if you are interested, I can you send you some code.
>
>Bye, Jochen
>
>PS: Sorry for late answer, I cannot regularly read this mailing list.
>
>Jochen Hiller
>Head of Research
>Bauer & Partner AG
>Esslenstr. 3
>CH-8280 Kreuzlingen
>Phone +41 71 67718 00
>Mobile +49 171 3396054
>Fax +41 71 67718 44
>Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Comeau, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2001 22:40
>To: 'LOG4J Users Mailing List'
>Subject: RE: java.util.logging
>
>The API is published so the implementation could be simulated for the purposes of
>developing the adapter. That way the adapter could be ready to ship soon after J2SE
>1.4 is available. Sync'ing with the actual implementation of java.util.logging
>shouldn't take too long. It should be a regression test at that point.
>I was wondering if anybody had taken on that job. No, I'm not volunteering. <g>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ceki Gülcü [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:33 PM
>To: LOG4J Users Mailing List
>Subject: Re: java.util.logging
>
>
>
>Greg,
>
>Funny coincidence, this question was asked in a different ML just a few hours ago.
>Before writing an adapter for JSR47, its implementation has to be available somewhere
>which is not the case for the moment. JSR47 is an implementation not an interface.
>Does that answer the question? Ceki
>At 14:05 21.02.2001 -0700, Comeau, Greg wrote:
>
>>Is anybody working on a Log4j adapter for the Java Logging API? (JSR #000047)
>----
>Ceki Gülcü Web: <http://qos.ch>http://qos.ch
>av. de Rumine 5 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
>CH-1005 Lausanne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Switzerland Tel: ++41 21 351 23 15
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope to see you at my ApacheCon 2001 presentation
entitled "Log4j, A Logging Package for Java".
See http://ApacheCon.Com/2001/US/ for more details.
----
Ceki Gülcü Web: http://qos.ch
av. de Rumine 5 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
CH-1005 Lausanne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switzerland Tel: ++41 21 351 23 15
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
