Greg McCarroll wrote: > smoothwall have a response to the article on their website, > poking a number of holes in the arguments put forward in > the article.
Ah, http://www.smoothwall.org/gpl/home/articles/team/20020109.ct-response.html (which looks absolutely unreadable with CSS turned off, as the lined background is behind the black text). I'll have a read through it. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
