Je 2003-09-21 01:03:06 +0100, Phil Lanch skribis: > alternatively, if the IETF could be tricked into issuing an RFC for > Esperanto, then i'm sure Lusercop would be fluent in no time.
:-) > i like the slightly sinister sound of "Perl Manipulistoj". Yeah me too. > i don't like the prospect of more messing about with fonts before i can > see e.g. c with a ^ when i'm using terminal mode (i realize that the > point is to have a different letter for each phoneme). i guess none of > the ISO-8859-? encodings cover all the characters Esperanto uses? It's the -3 one. http://www.bydg.pdi.net/~turismo/iso3/enkodigo.html -- "ISO-8859-3 (1988) [ ECMA-94 ]: "Latina alfabeto n-ro 3" (por suda Euxropo kaj Esperanto)" That page is in Latin-3 whereas london.pm.org uses HTML character entities & UTF-8. It seems to display on XP and Debian Linux (xfonts- 100dpi/75dpi/base/scalable - usual ones). There are a few ways of representing those letters in ASCII: the "x" system or using ^ after the letters. C^u vi komprenas? Jes, mi ankaux. I haven't got my xterm to do it with AltGr yet (and probably wouldn't be thanked anyway.) P -- Paul Makepeace ....................................... http://paulm.com/ "What is the most ephemeral thing? House plants on acid." -- http://paulm.com/toys/surrealism/
