Matt, I don't think local apps should have to be enabled in order to get this to work. They should be totally separate options with no mutual dependency or exclusivity between them. And I think it could be easily set up to work like this...
The only thing required is a way to start and stop the x0rfbserver remotely. This could be done by running an rsh server on all workstations. It could also be done by creating a special-purpose daemon just for this task. Then we could implement our own style of security measures in the controlling daemon. Jason On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:32:41 -0500 "Egan, Matt B. (Artco)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would local apps have to be enabled? I'd prefer it if > not. I realize that it > needs to run on the client machine but is there a way to > work around this so > that local apps don't have to be setup just for the use > of Xorfb? That's not > a big deal I just don't have local apps setup yet so it > would be more work > (not that I'm lazy) _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
