Hi > CPH, > > there's 2 issues keeping us from creating a 2.6 kernel package for LTSP. > > 1) There's no nfs-swap patch available for the 2.6.x kernel tree. > > 2) There's not enough hours in the day to do everything we want to do. > > > As for advantages in using the 2.6 kernel on the client, nobody has > given me a real good reason why they need it yet. > > > I have not seen this mentioned on the list so far, so I was wondering what the > > status (or outlook) is for using 2.6 on thin clients ? > > Is there know issues for why it is not currently being used ? > > Would there be significant advantages in using it ? > > Is anyone currently using it ?
[mharv] ~ # uname -a Linux mharv 2.6.7 #6 Fri Oct 15 09:13:02 UTC 2004 i686 unknown It does work beatifully. I did need it. If I can get the mod-utils to work I'll contribute it all back. At the mo I'm stuck with no modules !! James ------------------------------------------------------- This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
