On Sunday 02 May 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> i don't really see any clean way to do this, as with debian (and presumably
> ubuntu) you can run NFS and NBD LTSP environments on the same server. there
> are also options to use NBD without using ltsp-update-image, and running
> ltsp-update-image will clobber it, and recent versions will rewrite a bunch
> of configuration files for good measure.
Understood.
Would a simple compromise be a warning if "/opt/ltsp/images" does not
currently exist - this would catch the first run of this command and would be
a good opportunity of warning the user.
"By default Debian LTSP does not use ltsp-update-image, please run only if you
have configured your server to use NBD instead.
Are you sure you wish to continue (y|n)?"
If the user has chosen to move to NBD, and that is the reason they are running
ltsp-update-image, then they will be very aware of that fact, and will not be
confused. All other users will be grateful to take the opportunity to abort.
--
Chris Roberts
+------------------+--------------------------+
| Distribution | Debian Lenny |
| LTSP Version | 5.1.90-1 |
| LDM Version | 2.0.48-1 |
| Windows Manager | KDE 3.5.10 |
| Kernel | 2.6.26-bpo.1-686 |
+------------------+--------------------------+
| Distribution | Debian Lenny |
| LTSP Version | 5.1.85-1 |
| LDM Version | 2.0.45-1 |
| Windows Manager | KDE 3.5.10 |
| Kernel | 2.6.26-2-686 |
+------------------+--------------------------+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
