Yes. That is correct. I had wanted vectors to cache this squared length, but the consensus was that the caller could do it more correctly.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > The interface defines two methods: > > > double distance(Vector v1, Vector v2); > double distance(double centroidLengthSquare, Vector centroid, Vector v); > > > With the latter being an optimized form of the former, and satisfies: > > distance(v1, v2) == distance(v1.getLengthSquared(), v1, v2) > > Is this correct? Every place I see this method called, it is used in this > fashion, at least... > > -jake > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
