On Mar 15, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> GSI: I personally think the Opt-In model is best as it helps cement that >> someone is truly interested in helping out. Consider this my "I'm in" >> declaration if we go that route. > > Agree with this. Or else, the PMC isn't so useful to define as > something separate from the committer list. I'd be glad to be on the > PMC. > > >> GSI: Barring the Board suggesting otherwise, I'd suggest we handle the >> election privately after the TLP is established so just as we do with any >> personnel matter (i.e. electing committers). > > Sounds good. > > >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Mahout Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to a distributed computing platform; and be it further > > Probably doesn't matter but do we want to label this a > machine-learning project as well i this charter?
Darn copying and paste: Should read: >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Mahout Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to a machine learning platform;
