On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:56:03PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote: >Please don't dispair if I'm not as communicative as I usually am. For >those not aware, in the "real world" I've decided to leave my previous >position (of 13+ years!) and take on a new challenge. As a result, >there is some turbulence in my life at the moment and one consequence >of this is I've not gotten my email situation ironed out completely to >my satisfaction... this means I'm not reading email as consistently as >I'd like.
Good luck in your new position. >One thing: my original idea was to have a configure option that >enabled the DOS path capabilities. I note some here are advocating a >configure test which simply sets the HAVE_DOS_PATHS option if Cygwin >is detected, rather than leaving it up to the user. Is it the case >that people might want to build a Cygwin version of make _WITHOUT_ DOS >path support? > >Something to think about anyway. I'm all for flexibility. I suspect that this will have to be the default for cygwin, however, or we will hear wails of despair from any brave soul who tries to build from source. cgf _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list Make-w32@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
