$$$ boom: bonanza for the rich, but misery for working class


The following, an abridged version of a report by the Communist Party Economics 
Commission, is part of the discussion in preparation for the CPUSA's regional 
conferences on ideology scheduled for Oct. 23-24:


The decade of the 1990s has seen far-reaching changes, affecting all countries, 
including the United States. The decade began with the disastrous development of the 
counterrevolutionary destruction of the Soviet Union and its basic socialist 
structure, along with similar setbacks throughout Eastern Europe, devastating the 
economy, culture and living conditions of the people. 

This gave U.S. imperialism a great boost towards its goal: to be sole superpower. The 
United States has pursued this aim with cruelty and the ruthless killing, directly and 
indirectly, of many millions. 

Meanwhile, the gap between the super-rich and the rest of us grows wider. The United 
States has led in economic and technological growth, in the profits of its ruling 
class, in the rate of exploitation of labor and in the export of capital. 

It has been corrupted and has, to some extent, corrupted the rest of the world 
culturally - exemplified by the glut of advertising and the spread of drugs, gambling, 
etc. 

Monopolization of industry has proceeded very rapidly, as has the spread of 
inequalities within, as well as between, classes. Especially glaring is the 
intensification of racism. 

There has been rapidly expanding inequality between the U.S.-led bloc of imperialist 
countries - including NATO members in Europe, Japan and Canada - and the rest of the 
world, which is objectively neo-colonial. 

As the living standards of more than a billion people in these countries have been 
drastically reduced, the plunder of resources and labor by American and other monopoly 
corporations has been unrestrained. 

For two years the capitalist world has been in the grip of a severe financial crisis, 
which is still spreading. The neo-colonial countries bear the brunt of the crisis. 
Among the most advanced capitalist countries, Japan has been most seriously hit. Its 
government is intervening in a big way in the attempt to overcome the crisis, with 
uncertain results. 

In the U.S., the decade began with a rather mild crisis in 1990. But starting with the 
second half of 1992, there has been a continuous recovery, and at this stage, aspects 
of boom for eight years without interruption. 

However, the current increase in idle capacity is one indicator that a crisis may be 
looming. European countries have gone through crises at different times during the 
decade. Economic growth has been powered by computerization of society and by rapid 
advances in communications technology, including the Internet. 

Financial extremes have developed, notably the rise in prices on the stock market 
reaching far beyond the growth in economic activity and profits. This is an important 
factor ripening a major crisis of overproduction.


Militarization 

The main driving force of the U.S. economy is soaring military outlays. 

Military spending is budgeted to increase $110 billion over a six-year period, ending 
$50 billion higher than in fiscal 1999. To that has been added $10 to $20 billion for 
the war against Yugoslavia. This initiated the U.S. campaign to control all of 
southeastern Europe - on the road to the Ukraine and the Caspian Sea area with its oil 
- and northeastward toward Moscow. 

The anti-Communist content of this drive signifies that the Cold War has never really 
ended but has taken on new forms and targets. The attitude of the most powerful sector 
of the U.S. ruling class is expressed by The New York Times and its foreign affairs 
columnist, Thomas L. Friedman. The cover of the March 28 New York Times Magazine shows 
a gigantic fist wrapped in an American flag. The article's subhead reads, "From 
supercharged financial markets to Osama Bin Laden, the emerging global order demands 
an enforcer." 

"That's America's new burden," Friedman wrote. "The hidden hand of the market will 
never flourish without a hidden fist. McDonald's cannot flourish without McDonnell 
Douglas, the designer of the F-14. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for 
Silicon Valley's technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and 
Marine Corps." 

Friedman sees his view as fitting in with globalization of the economy. But while 
liberals see globalization as the interaction of economic forces everywhere without 
government intervention, Friedman sees it as an environment in which the United States 
can take control of the world and its capitalists can reap maximum profits.


The U.S. working class 

A modest rise in real wages and decline in unemployment has occurred over the past 
year. But the situation of the lowest paid and poorest section of the working class 
has worsened. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has stepped up propaganda about 
"spot labor shortages" pushing up wages "unduly," and that any further reduction in 
unemployment will slow economic growth. 

But there are still 5.8 million officially counted as unemployed, or 9.9 million 
according to the officially acknowledged fuller "alternative" measure of unemployment. 
Many times more workers with jobs are threatened with the wave of "downsizing" 
pervading corporate America. 

Because of the slash in anti-poverty benefits at federal, state and local levels, 
especially the drive to get people off welfare, conditions have actually worsened for 
many who get jobs: low wages, expenses for child care, getting to and from work, etc. 

The Clinton-Gore team has even stopped mentioning their previous low-keyed support for 
a dollar-an-hour rise in the minimum wage. As a result, reports from many major 
population centers indicate rising impoverishment, more people resorting to food 
kitchens to reduce hunger, and an increase in evictions. Economic discrimination 
against African Americans, Latinos and other people of color continues. Many of the 
"good jobs" in high-tech industries are effectively closed to all but a handful. 

The slight drop in minority unemployment is welcome, but minorities are 
disproportionately working two and three low-wage, part-time service jobs to survive. 
As always, they are likely to be "first fired" in the next economic downturn. 

In a recent speech, Greenspan uncharacteristically said what he clearly meant: the 
U.S. economy is "steadily depleting the pool of available workers," that is, providing 
jobs to the unemployed. He warned that this might enable workers to win pay increases 
and reduce the rate of exploitation. 

Commenting on this, economist Paul Krugman wrote that there is something "unsavory" 
about the thinking of central bankers like Greenspan. "Even liberal economists like 
myself grudgingly accept the conclusion that a responsible Fed must sometimes raise 
interest rates in order to limit the number of jobs and maintain a suitably high rate 
of unemployment," Krugman said. "But the scene remains an ugly one. A group of 
comfortable men and women in suits are deliberately acting to limit the job prospects 
of some of their worst-off fellow citizens." 

But Krugman, like British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his counterparts in 
continental Europe, is a reformist who ends up helping the ruling class against the 
working class. 

It is the Marxist-Leninist Communists who work towards substituting socialism for the 
capitalist system, to build a socialist system that will provide full employment and 
determine wages consistent with a planned, balanced economy. 

The continuous downtrend in real wages since 1973 has been accompanied by the more 
extreme impoverishment of the lowest paid workers, along with a spectacular upsurge in 
the take of those at the top. 

Since 1968 the real minimum wage has declined 32 percent, practically one-third. The 
situation would be even worse, except for the modest minimum wage increase forced 
through the Republican Congress in 1996 by an increasingly militant labor movement. 

Hundreds of thousands of low-wage workers have been helped by recent organizing 
victories like that of the 80,000 home health-care workers in California earlier this 
year. 

These are not yet enough to change the overall picture, but are laying the base for 
future political as well as contract victories. 

Meanwhile, executive compensation has gone through the roof. The highest paid CEO, 
Disney's Michael Eisner took in $576 million in 1998. In 1978, the highest paid got 
"only" $2 million. 

This year, the highest paycheck announced so far is Charles B. Wang's of Computer 
Associates International - $670 million! That's over $1,500 per minute. 

In the time it takes to drink a cup of coffee, Wang gets as much as a minimum-wage 
worker earns in an entire year of full-time work. According to the AFL-CIO, a worker 
earning $25,000 in 1994 would get $138,350 today - if his pay increased as fast as his 
bosses'! We estimate that 22 percent of gross profits - surplus value - goes for the 
compensation of high-ranking executives and that share has been rising. 

What are the qualifications for such high-paying jobs? The most important in recent 
years has been the ruthlessness and effectiveness in reducing labor costs by some 
combination of speedup, longer hours of work for their employees, and, most of all, 
laying off thousands of workers. 


Financial contradictions 

Throughout the first part of the 1990s, consumers saved about 6 percent of their 
income. But thereafter the rate of savings declined continuously, vanishing by 
December 1998 and becoming minus 1.1 percent by May 1999. 

The net "dissaving" so far this year is unprecedented since the great crisis of the 
1930s, and has given rise to expressions of concern in the business and financial 
press. 

The continuous "bull market" of recent years has much to do with these results. For 
millions of people, the stock market has become a medium of gambling. Capital gains on 
investments have become an important share of income for the half of the population 
above the median income. That includes direct investment in stocks and bonds and 
investment in mutual funds based on such investments. 

The number of shareholder accounts in equity mutual funds went up 450 percent during 
the 1990s, reaching 104 million in 1997. Assets in these funds also multiplied nearly 
10 times, reaching $2.4 trillion in 1997. 

The prices of corporate stocks have multiplied about 10 times since 1980, perhaps 
three times as fast as the increase in corporate gross profits. 

Shareholders have seen their stock portfolios increase in value (on paper) so they 
borrow freely to pay for current purchases. 

If the stock market falls, millions will default, resulting in foreclosures and 
repossessions. The vulnerability of the stock market is most graphically expressed in 
the prices of internet stocks, the medium of stock market gambling for many. 

Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) of such stocks, which have done no business and have 
no prospect of becoming real factors, are immediately gobbled up at 5 to 10 times the 
initial offering price. Companies floating a dream and a prayer have market valuations 
equal to those of giants like General Motors. 

Barron's columnist Alan Abelson warns, "Ignorant investors, buying wildly speculative 
stocks on credit define an accident waiting to happen. It could be triggered by a 
string of unbroken down days. The new on-line brokerage firms have no experience 
handling such situations." 

Contributing to financial instability, consumer debt is at its highest levels, with 
the biggest increase among the lowest 40 percent of the population. Criminal loan 
sharks have been displaced by "legitimate" loan outfits that charge extortionate fees 
to get workers to their next paycheck. New, tougher bankruptcy laws will provide the 
"vigorish" to force their victims to pay up. 

The 30 percent drop in stock prices in 1987 did not trigger a general cyclical decline 
in the economy. But overall conditions are much more vulnerable today, and a major 
bear market (downturn) is more likely to be associated with a crisis of overproduction 
in the "real" economy. Odds are strongly in the direction of a real "bear market" 
sometime in the next five years.


World financial crisis 

The world financial crisis, now two years old, has spread further. In Asia, where the 
crisis started, there has been easing, but no real stabilization. The crisis has 
deepened in Japan. U.S. companies have started to buy up distressed corporations, real 
estate and privatized state property at bargain prices. 

The crisis has spread further in South America, where the United States has a more 
sizable and leading economic and political involvement. Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, 
Venezuela and Peru face increasing unemployment and currency crises. 

The human costs are shown by the 15 percent decline in purchases of food staples in 
Argentina. Mexico is the only major Latin American country that has stabilized its 
situation, partly because of the strong influx of U.S. capital under NAFTA, at great 
cost to U.S. and Mexican workers. 

Throughout the rest of Latin America, expectations of declines in Gross Domestic 
Product this year have widened as unemployment soars - to 10 percent in Chile, 14 
percent in Argentina. Several Central American countries are still suffering economic 
crises because of devastating hurricane damage. 

The world financial crisis has spread to southeastern Europe, most acutely to 
Yugoslavia as a direct result of the U.S. bombing attacks. Albania, Macedonia, 
Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria are also involved. 

It is difficult to see how Russia can avoid default on its huge international debt. 
Washington is attempting to trade a few billion dollars of IMF loans - which would be 
earmarked solely to cover payments due on the existing debts - for unilateral Russian 
disarmament. 

Despite the crises surrounding it, the Chinese economy continues to grow, assisted by 
large government programs to offset unemployment as industries are rationalized. 
Official data show a growth rate of more than 8 percent this year. 

Washington recognizes China as basically a socialist country, despite the inroads of 
capitalist enterprises. As such it sees China as an enemy and conducts a steady flow 
of propaganda against it on grounds of "human rights," Tibet and spying, with warnings 
against Chinese actions to support its sovereignty over Taiwan. 

The strong Chinese economy, and the ability of Cuba to escape the world financial 
crisis, shows the superiority of socialism over capitalism. 

Unfortunately the AFL-CIO has joined the official U.S. chorus of anti-Chinese 
propaganda, echoing CIA distortions about human rights violations and singling out 
Chinese imports as a cause of job losses in the United States. 

The world financial crisis will be resolved by the kinds of programs pushed through 
the IMF and the U.S. Treasury, at the expense of the working class in the countries of 
the world. It can also be resolved by successful working class revolutions. 

The U.S. has strengthened its role as the dominant imperialist power in the world. The 
U.S. economy has, for now, been stabilized through military stimulus and profits from 
cheap access to world oil, natural and agricultural resources, and labor. Loot flows 
into the U.S. from world capitalists seeking a safe haven. 

Most of the benefits have gone to the wealthiest of the capitalist class, which is 
largely united behind an aggressive political and economic agenda at home and abroad. 

The Communist Party, on the other hand, advances a program for meeting the needs of 
the people: full employment through massive public works programs paid for by cutting 
military spending and taxing the rich; doubling the minimum wage and Social Security 
benefits, reducing the workweek, major affirmative action programs, repealing 
anti-labor laws and all-out support for union organizing drives. 

Conditions for a financial crisis are developing. Such an inevitable downturn will 
worsen the conditions of those already suffering and remove the illusion of stability 
and prosperity from many who appear to benefit from today's economy. 

During an economic crisis, the weakness of capitalism becomes visible to large 
numbers. 

While big business will try to shift the full cost onto the working class, our ability 
to resist takebacks and extend our rights depends in large measure on the strength and 
direction of the labor movement and other people's movements, not least of which is 
the Communist Party



     --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Reply via email to