| Any MTA will provide a sendmail binary for mail submission. There are
| also null clients like msmtp and nullmailer, but again, if using mutt
| there is no need for anything else.
|
What's a 'null client'?
AFAIK mutt wouldn't have a MTA. It would use <where-ever sendmail is
linked to> ?

| > fetchmail, mutt, postfix all will need to be tweaked -- some
| > punishment, yes, but in the end quite well worth the effort
|
| Much of that effort was wasted, or at least misdirected.
|
| > > gmail needs TLS/SSL
| > > Is TLS/SSL a part of `sendmail`, or will `sendmail` call TLS/SSL?
|
| Your submitting client would use STARTTLS as the second command in
| its SMTP connection to gmail. The remainder of the connection is
| encrypted, and through this encrypted connection your credentials
| would be presented to gmail.
|
| All MUAs (such as mutt) and MTAs (Postfix or Sendmail) nowadays
| implement TLS.
|
| > postfix's sendmail will use it if you tell it to, and get those
| > certificates installed
| --

As Previously explained: mutt or any other is no good, if it can't
show the whole gmail-directory, from yesterday's last on-line and
fetch or delete ANY item, without updating the directory.

I work like a hunter: the actual fetch or send is just a shot;
not like an angler, with the line in the water all day long.

I can't pay for redundant traffic or on-line time. I'd rather extend
the existing ETHOberon system, with SSL facilities.

== Chris Glur


On 2/10/13, mc-requ...@gnome.org <mc-requ...@gnome.org> wrote:
> Send mc mailing list submissions to
>       mc@gnome.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       mc-requ...@gnome.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       mc-ow...@gnome.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of mc digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Does anybody here use mc's : mail -s <subject> -c <cc>
>       <to> ? (tooth pik)
>    2. Re: Does anybody here use mc's : mail -s <subject> -c <cc>
>       <to> ? (/dev/rob0)
>    3. Flat Tree View in MC (Elad)
>    4. Behavior based on a certain external panelize (Elad)
>    5. Re: Does anybody here use mc's : mail -s <subject> -c <cc>
>       <to> ? (chris glur)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:12:48 -0600
> From: tooth pik <toothp...@gmail.com>
> To: chris glur <crg...@gmail.com>, mc@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: Does anybody here use mc's : mail -s <subject> -c <cc>
>       <to> ?
> Message-ID: <20130209161248.ga4...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:49:56AM +0200, chris glur wrote:
>> AFAICS an email client has 2 parts:
>> 1. a data-base to manage the In/Out mails
>> 2. transport agent/s for send and receive.
>
>> Since mc is THE superb data-base manager, it seems that it could do email
>> well?
>
> I don't know if mc will do mail or not -- if you are looking for
> something sensible why not use mutt?  I can verify mutt can send and
> receive gmail, having become disenchanted with the service provided by
> my ISP.  You'll want to be sure to use the sendmail provided by
> postfix (just install postfix:  it'll de-install the old sendmail if
> it's there).  You'll need google's certificates:  there's a good
> (well, usable) set of instructions on setting it all up at:
>
>
> http://www.linuxexpert.ro/Linux-Tutorials/fetchmail-for-gmail-accounts.html
>
>> In my failed-state location, ISP's email facilities have crapped out, or
>> perhaps
>> the natives can only use FB & twitter; so I've had to resort to gmail,
>> which is
>> very inefficient and frustrating in the default/http mode.
>
> fetchmail will pull gmail Inbox contents down to your pc where mutt
> can display in threads, and allow you to compose replies in vim, all
> very efficient.
>
>> Does "mail -s <subject> -c <cc> <to>" use `sendmail` [or its proxy]?
>> sendmail is punishment to setup !
>
> fetchmail, mutt, postfix all will need to be tweaked -- some
> punishment, yes, but in the end quite well worth the effort
>
>> gmail needs TLS/SSL
>> Is TLS/SSL a part of `sendmail`, or will `sendmail` call TLS/SSL?
>
> postfix's sendmail will use it if you tell it to, and get those
> certificates installed
>
> hth,
>
> sc
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:56:29 -0600
> From: /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk>
> To: mc@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: Does anybody here use mc's : mail -s <subject> -c <cc>
>       <to> ?
> Message-ID: <20130209165629.gg3...@harrier.slackbuilds.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Comments directed to both posters are inline.
>
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:12:48AM -0600, tooth pik wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:49:56AM +0200, chris glur wrote:
>> > AFAICS an email client has 2 parts:
>> > 1. a data-base to manage the In/Out mails
>
> Database? What? A MUA either uses IMAP to read mail, or it reads the
> local mail files (mbox or maildir, typically.)
>
>> > 2. transport agent/s for send and receive.
>
> Something to open the network socket and speak IMAP or SMTP, yes.
>
>> > Since mc is THE superb data-base manager, it seems that it could
>> > do email well?
>>
>> I don't know if mc will do mail or not -- if you are looking for
>> something sensible why not use mutt?  I can verify mutt can send
>> and receive gmail, having become disenchanted with the service
>> provided by my ISP.  You'll want to be sure to use the sendmail
>> provided by postfix
>
> I don't recommend a MTA for this. Too many moving parts. Recent
> mutt(1) versions support SMTP, and it has long had IMAP support (and
> POP3 also, but let's just let POP3 die as it should have a decade
> ago.)
>
>> (just install postfix: it'll de-install the old sendmail if it's
>> there).
>
> That will vary by OS/distro. Not necessarily true.
>
>>  You'll need google's certificates:  there's a good
>> (well, usable) set of instructions on setting it all up at:
>>
>>
>> http://www.linuxexpert.ro/Linux-Tutorials/fetchmail-for-gmail-accounts.html
>
> Ugh, fetchmail sucks, and it provides nothing of benefit here. All
> you need is in mutt. Learn mutt well and you're done. Without
> bothering to review your tutorial, I'll guess it's bad.
>
>> > In my failed-state location, ISP's email facilities have crapped
>> > out, or perhaps the natives can only use FB & twitter; so I've
>> > had to resort to gmail, which is very inefficient and frustrating
>> > in the default/http mode.
>>
>> fetchmail will pull gmail Inbox contents down to your pc where mutt
>> can display in threads, and allow you to compose replies in vim, all
>> very efficient.
>
> (vim or your editor of choice, including mcedit)
>
>> > Does "mail -s <subject> -c <cc> <to>" use `sendmail` [or its
>> > proxy]?
>
> I don't see a "mail" feature in mc. If you are talking about the CLI
> mail(1) utility, it has a man page. Heirloom mailx indeed defaults to
> sendmail(1) for outbound sending.
>
>> > sendmail is punishment to setup !
>
> Any MTA will provide a sendmail binary for mail submission. There are
> also null clients like msmtp and nullmailer, but again, if using mutt
> there is no need for anything else.
>
>> fetchmail, mutt, postfix all will need to be tweaked -- some
>> punishment, yes, but in the end quite well worth the effort
>
> Much of that effort was wasted, or at least misdirected.
>
>> > gmail needs TLS/SSL
>> > Is TLS/SSL a part of `sendmail`, or will `sendmail` call TLS/SSL?
>
> Your submitting client would use STARTTLS as the second command in
> its SMTP connection to gmail. The remainder of the connection is
> encrypted, and through this encrypted connection your credentials
> would be presented to gmail.
>
> All MUAs (such as mutt) and MTAs (Postfix or Sendmail) nowadays
> implement TLS.
>
>> postfix's sendmail will use it if you tell it to, and get those
>> certificates installed
> --
>   http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting
>   Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:43:10 +0200
> From: Elad <webdevsupr...@gmail.com>
> To: mc@gnome.org
> Subject: Flat Tree View in MC
> Message-ID: <5116c2ee.70...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Is there a way to achieve a native flat tree view in Midnight Commander?
> One which allows me to go directly into the containing file's folder
> using "see in other pane" command, for example.
> External panelize is not an option, since it does not allow this.
>
> See the feature here:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McWFE1WbM7I&feature=youtu.be
> It shows this in Total Commander, under windows.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:52:39 +0200
> From: Elad <webdevsupr...@gmail.com>
> To: mc@gnome.org
> Subject: Behavior based on a certain external panelize
> Message-ID: <5116c527.3010...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I've been waiting for ages for a certain ticket to have any progress:
> https://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/1636
> but it seems like it was forsaken.
>
> So I thought about making something similar using the external panelize:
> I have a file containing key-value pairs of a name and directory,
> seperated by space,
> E.g. SomeDirectory /var/www/This/And/That/Directory.
>
> Using external panelize I can easily extract the key values to show as a
> list,
> but I need to have MC recognize them as special -
> When I hit return on one of them,
> I want MC to automatically cd into them.
>
> I would rather not have a specific user menu command for this feature,
> albeit if that is the only way,
> a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:42:58 +0200
> From: chris glur <crg...@gmail.com>
> To: tooth pik <toothp...@gmail.com>
> Cc: mc@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: Does anybody here use mc's : mail -s <subject> -c <cc>
>       <to> ?
> Message-ID:
>       <CACe=ECq785dHPe__RgadDXrQc5Ny=-ek45bqm_b8kc6qxit...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> |I don't know if mc will do mail or not -- if you are looking for
> |something sensible why not use mutt?  I can verify mutt can send and
> |receive gmail, having become disenchanted with the service provided by
> |my ISP.  You'll want to be sure to use the sendmail provided by
> |postfix (just install postfix:  it'll de-install the old sendmail if
> |it's there).  You'll need google's certificates:  there's a good
> |(well, usable) set of instructions on setting it all up at:
>
> |http://www.linuxexpert.ro/Linux-Tutorials/fetchmail-for-gmail-accounts.html
>
> OK thanks, I'll check that; but apparently mutt won't scroll it's
> mail-directory, unless it's on-line. Which is absurd for me.
> My on-line time is expensive.
> My proper system [ETHOberon] which I could use before the local ISPs
> collapsed
> could fetch the articles-directory with one-shot. And at any time LATER
> when
> going on-line again, could fetch or delete [from the ISP's server] any
> article
> in the local directory, with one shot.  The item was deleted from the local
> directory, when the ISP-deletion was signalled as done.
>
> Since mutt doesn't do any of the transport/fetching, and manipulation of
> the files, eg. for extracting/modifying parts is less transparent than mc,
> mutt seems to add no value for me. I need to have access to the article-dir
> that I downloaded [and paid for] yesterday, to fetch/delete any article
> tomorrow.
>
> |fetchmail will pull gmail Inbox contents down to your pc where mu
> |can display in threads, and allow you to compose replies in vim, all
> |very efficient.
>
> Admittedly my old system didn't thread the mails; but fetching and
> displaying
> the article-dir is trivial. And the rest of mutt's job is done more
> transparently by mc.
>
> |> gmail needs TLS/SSL
> |> Is TLS/SSL a part of `sendmail`, or will `sendmail` call TLS/SSL?
> |
> |postfix's sendmail will use it if you tell it to, and get those
> |certificates installed
>
> That's the main punishment.
>
> Thanks for the input.
>
> == Chris Glur.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> mc mailing list
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of mc Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3
> **********************************
>
_______________________________________________
mc mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc

Reply via email to