After Jake told me about LAME, I went and downloaded and compared it to
L3enc and BladeEnc... I must say, I am amazed at the difference between it
and Blade -- it's like going from 80 kbps MP3 to a MD. :)
From now on, if I have to make an mp3, I'll do it with LAME. I could tell a
BIG difference.
...and that's yet another nice feature about minidisc -- no silly bitrate to
set, no worrying if you're squeezing a turnip or wasting space. :)
~~Zach
http://start.at/cens
In a message dated 12/8/99 6:43:00 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
/|\/|\ Personally, I can't hear the difference between the two, maybe it's
only noticeable when you listen to classical music. c't magazine wrote that
bladeenc sounds completely crappy at 64 kbps while lame is fairly good, but
who encodes at bitrates that low anyway ? /|\/|\
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
