From: "las" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (snip) > For example, at the present time we have no science that can exceed the speed of > light. That does not mean that someone wouldn't come along some day find a way > to exceed light speed. Thus proving Einstein wrong. > Larry Not strictly true, Larry. It has been demonstrated in laboratories that information may travel faster than light through "quantum-tunneling" which I confess I am not particular well up on, but has demonstrated information can be transmitted at about two or three times the speed of light albeit with high error rates, but correctable and most definetley faster than light (think of it as sending something which takes a day to arrive but you add extra stuff to correct errors which adds an hour, except the day was more like a picosecond and the hour a fraction of that :-) A German(?) laboratory sent classical music at about twice the speed of light through such a link and it was comparable to a RealAudio 16kbps stream. And I don't think they were using error correction but cannot be certain. Cheers, PrinceGaz -- "if it harms none, do what you will" Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://website.lineone.net/~princegaz/ ICQ: 36892193 ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
