===================================================
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===================================================
well as it says in the "Myths" section of your grocer's minidisc.org, the
actual storage of data is digital only - therefore the disk really doesn't
have anything to do with it. All of the digital to analog conversion, and
error correction takes place BEFORE OR AFTER the data is stored, so the
media shouldn't really have anything to do with it.
It's a dog gone good read, that. I highly recommend it. But as I said
earlier, I've gotten two people that think akin to me, so we'll just keep
buying the TDKs and everyone will be pretty happy with the whole business.
> ----------
> From: Charles Redell
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 7:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks?
>
>
> > "Davini, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I read the "Myths" within the Minidisc.org page, and everything Mr.
> > > Woudenberg writes makes perfect sense to me, BUT - - - - Could
> > > someone please tell me WHY I REALLY DO hear a difference between
> > > discs then?
>
> I don't understand why there isn't a differnece in sound quality between
> blanks (If that is really the case)? I mean, why are some more expensive
> tha
> others? Are some not made better/easier for the laser to read/smoother
> inoperation or something akin to all of that?
>
> Cassettes definitely have higher qualities amongst them... Why not MDs?
>
> Thanks,
> c
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
