Dan Frakes wrote:
> Jim, you're simply trying to shove your point of view on everyone else.
> Those of us on digest are not stupid.
It has nothing to do with being stupid. a lot of people get the digest
because they don'tknow how to set up filters and folders. Again, It
has nothing to do with being stupid.
> >For most people, digest mode doesn't solve
> >anything and creates a lot of problems.
>
> You cannot make such a blanket statement. That's your opinion, nothing
> more. And judging by the fact that most mailing lists have large
> proportions of digest subscribers, an opinion not shared by most people.
I can make it and I did. While there are some people that are forced to
use rudimentary mailer program that can't sort mail automatically, and
some have a notification set when ever a messaage comes in, most people
can use individual messages to their advantage.
>
> >IMHO, people that don't like it can either skip over it and not read
> >it, or they can just delete it, or they can set up a filter and
> >delete it.
>
> Not if they subscribe to the digest (see above).
Get mindividual messages, (See above)
>
> >It certainly doesn't cause a big burden to see the title of a message
> >and then delete it.
>
> It does if you receive the digest (see above).
Get mindividual messages, (See above)
>
> Simple. What's the problem? The only one I've seen is...
Some people stick with digest mode and don't know how to change it.
--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?
My first web page
http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
