On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 8:21 PM Boris FELD <boris.f...@octobus.net> wrote:
> On 23/11/2018 15:49, Pulkit Goyal wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 5:19 PM Boris Feld <boris.f...@octobus.net> wrote: > >> # HG changeset patch >> # User Boris Feld <boris.f...@octobus.net> >> # Date 1542935471 -3600 >> # Fri Nov 23 02:11:11 2018 +0100 >> # Node ID 9f543638d909768a0db0aa779d37817c4b8878ab >> # Parent e72da9d014ba91ee4f2fe620a9646404a64d7484 >> # EXP-Topic perf-branchmap >> # Available At https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ >> # hg pull https://bitbucket.org/octobus/mercurial-devel/ -r >> 9f543638d909 >> perf: prewarm the branchmap in perfbranchmapload >> >> It is not very interesting to have the command randomly failing because >> the >> branchmap for the tested filter happens to be cold. So we make sure to >> have a >> valid up to date branchmap before going further. >> >> The data might still be missing from disk if a subset was equivalent. See >> next >> changeset for details and fix. >> >> diff --git a/contrib/perf.py b/contrib/perf.py >> --- a/contrib/perf.py >> +++ b/contrib/perf.py >> @@ -2203,6 +2203,9 @@ def perfbranchmapload(ui, repo, filter=b >> repo = repoview.repoview(repo, filter) >> else: >> repo = repo.unfiltered() >> + >> + repo.branchmap # make sure we have a relevant, up to date branchmap >> > > Do you want to call this function? According to my understanding it won't > load the branchmap or do something useful. > > Ho yeah, good catch. > Okay, appended '()' in flight and queued 6-8, many thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Mercurial-devel mailing > listMercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.orghttps://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
