On 01/11/2014 07:39 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hello list, > > As you already know with the inception of gallium a lot of the classic > mesa code was copied over to gallium/auxiliary for multitude of reasons. > > Recently I came across a handful of cases where classic mesa has become > more robust while gallium is still in the mist (and vice versa). > > Considering the lack of divergence should we get those back together or > are we going to continue ad-hoc patching? > > Taking into account our lovely build systems and the function names > used, there are a few things to consider: > > * files location - concentrate new location (eg. src/common) > * naming convention - the gallium seems more consistent and reasonable > > IHMO the above two yeld the following > Pros > * clear boundaries of what is done > * less of a build chaos in the long term > Cons > * some initial work needs to be done for all build systems :\ > > How do you feel on the subject ? > > Cheers, > Emil
Yep, it's a great idea. We've talked about doing that on a number of occasions, and pretty much everybody was on board. I think src/util was the preferred spot. If you'd like to take this on, I think everybody would be grateful :) --Ken _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
