> > > I'm willing to rewrite the theorems I have now with ( 1 ... N ) into ( 0 > ..^ N ) if such is the choice of the community, but I don't see any > efficient and clear way to make it working in a flexible way for both at > the same time. > > A finite totally ordered set ?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/a9540698-ecec-4a33-9bdd-205822855f1cn%40googlegroups.com.
