On 2/8/07, Scott Reynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So as I understand that, the rules for getting the most authoritative hCard for a given URL are: 1) parse hCard at current URL 2) If the hCard includes <a class="uid url">, load the URL in the href, and return to step 1. When the consumer gets to http://theryanking.com/blog/contact/#vcard and finds no <a class="uid url">, it stops there and that's his authoritative hCard.
OK (and I'm not trying to turn into Andy here), but doesn't this feel at least a little unsatisfactory? That the authoritative hCard is the one that _doesn't_ have a UID, i.e. potentially has less information than a fragment hCard?! I'm not killer against the idea or anything, but at least I think that should be brought up. Here's one potential usage snag: - I copy the hCard at http://theryanking.com/blog/contact/#vcard to my "address book" - I use it somewhere (to refer to Ryan King) - It doesn't have a UID, so there's no tracing it back to source Regards, etc... -- David Janes Founder, BlogMatrix http://www.blogmatrix.com http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
