Even if one did not have a future, why wouldn't you use it? Both GTK and QT, on which respectively GTK# and QT# rely, both have a big userbase.
So even if GTK# or QT# would cease to exist, you can still use the last version right?
Only my opinion though :) So if you ask me: use the one you like most.
-- Sijmen Mulder:
1 Linux gamer 2 .NET coder (in linux!) 3 IRC gek (ook in linux) 4 Stageloper 5 Stommesignatures-schrijver
From: Davy Brion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mono-list] QT# or GTK# ? Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:59:34 +0000
Hey guys,
i'd like to hear some arguments over which one is better or has the most promising future. Personally i'd prefer to use QT# because i'm a KDE user, but if GTK# is better or has a better future, then i'd rather go with GTK#.
Has anyone used them both? If so, can you please comment on the quality of
both? Or if you just have any comments on which one i should use, please go
ahead and list them since i just want the best one and i'd like to hear from
people who've used either one of them or preferably both.
thx
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
_________________________________________________________________ MSN Zoeken, voor duidelijke zoekresultaten! http://search.msn.nl
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
