I didn't see any of the paper materials outside of the few framed ones they had on the walls but I was told almost all of the stills in the Browning collection were in excellent condition with the majority of them printed exclusively for Browning's review on gelatin silver double weight with some on single matte and gloss. I'm guessing a lot of these stills were singular and never seen before as a result. I think you can order a catalog from Profiles (or maybe find the digital version online). Some really unique images.
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote: > > Congrats on the win, Paul. > > And with the cheapest still selling for $4000.00, that truly says something > about what the Browning Collection was all about. Were all the stills of the > same type (double weight) and wonderful condition? > > > >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote: >> >> I'm a Kubrick collector mostly so I won the "Lolita" stills lot. Really only >> needed 2 of the 10 stills but I figure I can turn around the others pretty >> easily. >> >> They had about 250-300 stills and other items from the Browning collection >> which I think was 157 lots. Probably about 35-40 lots on Freaks alone and I >> think the cheapest I saw sell for $4000. It was majority stills. They had a >> satchel that held all of the stills which also went for 10k+. >> >> A lot of the Hurrell stills sold fairly high as well. >> >> Paul >> >>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:41 PM, Jeff Potokar <jpotok...@ca.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>> Congrats on winning the lot you wanted, Paul. >>> >>> I'm also in So CA and need to make the effort to get to one of Profiles' >>> auctions. I would also really enjoy seeing some of this material in person. >>> >>> Can I ask which lot (item) you won? >>> >>> And how many pieces, in total, were offered as part of the Browning >>> Collection? Was everything from his estate comprised of stills? >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Paul W. Hazen wrote: >>>> >>>> This was my first time in person, I've usually been on the phone as well. >>>> There was about 20-25 people in the back room where the auction was. They >>>> had about 10 or so phone banks set up for the phone bidders and a couple >>>> people running the online bidding. Was all very professional and had my >>>> own paddle and everything. They had a good dinner spread as well. >>>> >>>> They had a lot of the consignments in display cases including all the big >>>> ones and the people that worked there were really friendly and answered >>>> all of my questions. I didn't see too much of the paper materials >>>> displayed, mostly just the props, but it was pretty cool seeing some of >>>> them close up. >>>> >>>> It's definitely an interesting experience and I wouldn't hesitate to sit >>>> it in on another one. >>>> >>>> The auction did go a lot longer than I anticipated (I was only there for >>>> one lot in particular - which I won) but it was no fault of their own, >>>> they just had a ton of bids. There were some guys that were there for >>>> almost 12 hours when I left after 4 hours. >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:51 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I guess the provenance was almost impossible to pass up. Did manage to >>>>> get a Browning Dracula still so I don't feel too bad about London After >>>>> Midnight. >>>>> >>>>> What's it like at their auctions? I've always done the phone. >>>>> >>>>> Nathalie >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Paul W. Hazen <phazenme...@aol.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I was in the room during the Profiles Browning bidding session and was >>>>>> truly amazed at some of the prices the Browning stills were getting >>>>>> especially the Freaks stills which seem to be have been bought primarily >>>>>> by the same two phone bidders. Profiles did a great job on that >>>>>> acquisition and auction and I'm looking forward to the Debbie Reynolds >>>>>> auction in September. >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:26 PM, S Yafet <sya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wow! Naively, I thought it would be great to have something of Tod >>>>>>> Browning's from London After Midnight. Then, I realized that the four >>>>>>> stills I liked the best were climbing higher and higher. Wound up at >>>>>>> 18K. My phone bidder helper guy told me I could keep one and sell the >>>>>>> other three. Well, no guarantees on something like that but I can't >>>>>>> say I wasn't seriously tempted. (I thought maybe I'd worry about the >>>>>>> money later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nathalie >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Scott Burns <sbu...@columbus.rr.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Wish I had cash like this laying around…(guess I’ll just stay with >>>>>>>> collecting paper). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A complete R2D2 just sold for $2.3 million at the Profiles in History >>>>>>>> movie memorabilia auction. Not being a prop collector, I wonder is >>>>>>>> this price record setting? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From the catalog: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1298. Complete “R2-D2” unit assembled from original components >>>>>>>> spanning the original Star Wars trilogy and Episodes I & II. (TCF, >>>>>>>> 1977 - 2002) A complete film used R2 unit is not known to be in the >>>>>>>> public domain – this R2-D2 offering represents the pinnacle of the >>>>>>>> Star Wars collecting universe. For the productions following Star >>>>>>>> Wars: A New Hope, to save time in meeting production deadlines, R2 >>>>>>>> components were reused from the previous Star Wars films. As filming >>>>>>>> progressed, R2 units were upgraded and refurbished, with outdated >>>>>>>> components being retired. This process has been confirmed by numerous >>>>>>>> crewmembers who worked on the Star Wars film franchise. This R2-D2, >>>>>>>> constructed of aluminum, steel and fiberglass elements, measuring 43 >>>>>>>> in. tall x 29.5 in. wide x 20 in. deep (in current pose), was put >>>>>>>> together over many years by sourcing original components and >>>>>>>> assembling them as a complete R2-D2. The dome was one of the few hero >>>>>>>> aluminum domes made for R2 actor Kenny Baker in the first film (A New >>>>>>>> Hope, 1977) and is the only one known in the public domain. It was >>>>>>>> used throughout the original trilogy as well as Episode I and can be >>>>>>>> screen matched by the fiber optic array to scenes in Return of the >>>>>>>> Jedi and Episode I. It features a handle to articulate the front eye >>>>>>>> from inside the unit by Kenny Baker. The metal “greeblies” (fine >>>>>>>> details added to make the device appear more complex) inserted into >>>>>>>> the front and rear of the body, and those on the feet, were made for A >>>>>>>> New Hope and used on R2 units throughout the original trilogy. The >>>>>>>> left and right legs were made for Empire Strikes Back and were >>>>>>>> acquired as complete items. One leg retains the Empire paint scheme >>>>>>>> and the other from Jedi. The middle and left foot were used on an >>>>>>>> original trilogy R2 and were used as the master pattern for the feet >>>>>>>> created for Episode I. The right foot is production made for Episode I >>>>>>>> but not used. The small opening hatch on the back of the body was used >>>>>>>> in Episode II. The barrel of the body was made for Episode I and it >>>>>>>> was subsequently painted and detailed for this R2 unit. Given the ad >>>>>>>> hoc nature of production practices, any “complete” existing R2-D2 >>>>>>>> units from the first trilogy (in studio hands) would be a compilation >>>>>>>> very similar to this R2-D2 unit offered here. No internal mechanics or >>>>>>>> workings are present. Not merely a prop, costume piece or filming >>>>>>>> miniature, R2-D2 is a major, beloved character in the Star Wars >>>>>>>> universe. Without question, this is the finest piece ever offered from >>>>>>>> this incredible franchise. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One of the most instantly recognizable pieces of pop culture in >>>>>>>> existence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link: >>>>>>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link: >>>>>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link: >>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1 >>>> >>> > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
