Here are figures for a 2.66 GHz Xeon (Core 2) under linux:
***** MPIRbench version 0.1 *****
Using default CFLAGS = "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -I/home/wbhart/mpir-core2/"
Using default CC = "gcc"
Using default LIBS = "-static -L/home/wbhart/mpir-core2/.libs/ -lmpir"
Using compilation command: gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-I/home/wbhart/mpir-core2/ foo.c -o foo -static
-L/home/wbhart/mpir-core2/.libs/ -lmpir
You may want to override CC, CFLAGS, and LIBS
Using MPIR version: 0.9.0
Compiling benchmarks
Running benchmarks
Category base
Program multiply
multiply 128 128
MPIRbench.base.multiply.128,128 result: 36290755
multiply 512 512
MPIRbench.base.multiply.512,512 result: 6974234
multiply 8192 8192
MPIRbench.base.multiply.8192,8192 result: 64000
multiply 131072 131072
MPIRbench.base.multiply.131072,131072 result: 928
multiply 2097152 2097152
MPIRbench.base.multiply.2097152,2097152 result: 36.4
MPIRbench.base.multiply result: 55927
Program divide
divide 8192 32
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192,32 result: 603601
divide 8192 64
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192,64 result: 620812
divide 8192 128
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192,128 result: 336842
divide 8192 4096
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192,4096 result: 109596
divide 8192 8064
MPIRbench.base.divide.8192,8064 result: 1404355
divide 131072 8192
MPIRbench.base.divide.131072,8192 result: 2292
divide 131072 65536
MPIRbench.base.divide.131072,65536 result: 1212
divide 8388608 4194304
MPIRbench.base.divide.8388608,4194304 result: 3.34
MPIRbench.base.divide result: 25526
MPIRbench.base result: 37784
Category app
Program rsa
rsa 512
MPIRbench.app.rsa.512 result: 15277
rsa 1024
MPIRbench.app.rsa.1024 result: 3134
rsa 2048
MPIRbench.app.rsa.2048 result: 476
MPIRbench.app.rsa result: 2835.2
MPIRbench.app result: 2835.2
MPIRbench result: 10350
Bill.
2009/3/3 Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>:
> As the Sage project is currently investing a lot into Windows porting,
> I asked on the sage-devel list if anyone has a suitable Core 2 machine
> with Windows.
>
> Bill.
>
> 2009/3/3 Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>:
>> I should add that I don't have access to Windows on Core 2 anywhere.
>> In fact I do not know anyone who has this.
>>
>> Bill.
>>
>> 2009/3/3 Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>:
>> - Show quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
>>> I finished some work I was doing on my other project FLINT 5 days
>>> early!! So I will spend a little time on mpir again. I'll work up some
>>> timings for you on a core 2.
>>>
>>> Bill.
>>>
>>> 2009/3/3 Cactus <rieman...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 3, 12:42 pm, Jeff Gilchrist <jeff.gilchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Cactus <rieman...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > I have added batch files in the vc9.build directory - to_gmp.bat and
>>>>> > to_mpir.bat - for name conversion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Great, thanks, it seems to work well for the build.vc9 directory.
>>>>> When you eventually convert your support for gmp-ecm and others to
>>>>> MPIR, you will notice that it looks for "gmp.h" in the root of the
>>>>> gmp/ directory so the batch file to convert from mpir to gmp misses
>>>>> changing the root mpir.h to gmp.h.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, I'll fix that.
>>>>
>>>>> > I have also added the new assembler code.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will be testing it soon.
>>>>
>>>> I am confident in the AMD64 stuff. But I am NOT yet confident in the
>>>> performance of the Core2 code.
>>>>
>>>> I need x86_64 results for the Core2 code on both Windows and Linux/gcc/
>>>> gas to know where I am with this architecture in performance terms.
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>> >>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
