Doing that right now. 2009/3/6 <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: > > On Friday 06 March 2009 00:56:42 Bill Hart wrote: >> That was it. Time jumps back to 10300 if I delete those two files. >> >> I recommend getting rid of those, or optimising them. :-) >> >> Phew!! >> > > I moved them as fat build needs a native copyi/d , if not we have to write a > wrapper like for mul_basecase , no problem, I'll do it in a mo > I'm more surprised they make that much difference , I think we better check > they are faster on AMD as well?? > - Show quoted text - > >> Bill. >> >> 2009/3/6 <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: >> > On Friday 06 March 2009 00:33:57 Bill Hart wrote: >> >> I checked all the speed times we have for this machine and they've not >> >> changed. But something is broken. Before the commit you did we have >> >> 10100, now 9500. Of course before the yasm changeover it was 10300. >> > >> > r1671 I moved amd copyi/d to x86_86 directory , so now they are used on >> > core2 , but even if they were junk , you wouldn't get a slowdown like >> > that >> > >> > I'm mystified >> > - Show quoted text - >> > >> >> And yeah, I mean mpirbench. >> >> >> >> Bill. >> >> >> >> 2009/3/6 <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: >> >> > On Thursday 05 March 2009 23:02:50 Bill Hart wrote: >> >> >> I just don't get this. We are 10% down on what we had before on >> >> >> sage.math. I've tried deleting the files that you say we being left >> >> >> out before and that doesn't change anything. >> >> > >> >> > Welcome to the wacky world of assembler !!!!! >> >> > >> >> >> What else got changed? >> >> > >> >> > I assume you mean mpirbench ? >> >> > I cant see any differences in times for speed for >> >> > add,mul,mulbase,sqrbase - Show quoted text - >> >> > >> >> >> Bill. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2009/3/5 <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: >> >> >> > On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:05:32 Bill Hart wrote: >> >> >> >> Yeah I suspect we'll have lot's of opportunity to speed up core 2 >> >> >> >> eventually. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> If I recall correctly it was about 4.5 c/l for core 2. Does anyone >> >> >> >> know if this is optimal? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I've got a 4.4c/l , Agner Fog's says the thruput on 64 bit mul is >> >> >> > 4c/l , but in another section it says you can issue one every cycle >> >> >> > , if the latter section means 32bit then , 4c/l could be right ( I >> >> >> > say could not would as consider the K8) , I expect I can do a bit >> >> >> > better than 4.4c/l , but who knows.A lot of the speed comes from >> >> >> > reducing the overhead in mul_basecase. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > It quite a wide cpu , I would expect the combined functions(like >> >> >> > addlsh1) to make a real difference on it. >> >> >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Supposedly you can do 4 or even 5 instructions at once with >> >> >> >> instruction fusion. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bill. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 05/03/2009, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com >> >> >> >> <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> >> >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > the functions missed out were >> >> >> >> > addadd >> >> >> >> > addsub >> >> >> >> > addlsh >> >> >> >> > sublsh >> >> >> >> > the 2% due to them is not bad , considering they were written >> >> >> >> > for an AMD chip. >> >> >> >> > The other new functions like redc,sumdiff are used >> >> >> >> > unconditionally >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I think sumdiff is still in the optional section of configure , >> >> >> >> > must change this some time , it's confusing , but it doesn't >> >> >> >> > hurt. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > On Thursday 05 March 2009 18:42:20 Bill Hart wrote: >> >> >> >> >> If the mpirbench is about 10300 on sage.math then it worked. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I can't check it till I'm home. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bill. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 05/03/2009, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com >> >> >> >> >> <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > commited , and I think I should be >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > On Thursday 05 March 2009 17:50:59 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Done it , just cant commit at the moment !!! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thursday 05 March 2009 17:43:04 Bill Hart wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Damnit I am still not getting anything in config.h. I must >> >> >> >> >> >> > be doing something wrong. I'm going to let Jason fix this. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Perhaps dos2unix isn't doing the job. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > I have to go out for a few hours. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Bill. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > 2009/3/5 Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>: >> >> >> >> >> >> > > It's not clear to me why WinSCP didn't change the line >> >> >> >> >> >> > > endings. It probably didn't identify the files as text >> >> >> >> >> >> > > files. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Bill. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 2009/3/5 Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>: >> >> >> >> >> >> > > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Should do the same for all files in /mpn/x86_64/core2, >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> /mpn/x86_64/amd64 and /mpn/x86_64/amd64/k10 >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> It's just a matter of running dos2unix *.as in each dir >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> I think. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Bill. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> 2009/3/5 <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com>: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> On Thursday 05 March 2009 17:37:31 Cactus wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> On Mar 5, 5:37 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> > must be Brian script , they are all full of "\r" >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> > which of course means the matching name is >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> > mpn_name\r not mpn_name removing the "\r" is easy >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> > on all files, but we will probably hit the problem >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> > again , and/or I can put a tr -d "\r" >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> > to delete all "\r" in that specific piece of >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> > configure We could hit the problem in other >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> > places!!! >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> Only because you got me to run it on Windows. My >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> guess is that it >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> would produce the right line endings if the Python >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> code was run on Linux >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Great , if it only those few that Bill asked you to >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> convert , then >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> I'll delete the \r and leave the configure script >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> alone - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>> Brian >> >> > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
