2010/1/11 Gianrico Fini <gianrico.f...@gmail.com>:
>> With all due respect, I think you are vastly underestimating the
>> difficulty of providing robust, efficient, well tested code for your
>> benefit. There's tens of thousands of lines of code been put into the
>> MPIR library, and to just dismiss it all as a joke because you found
>> something which you don't like in our benchmark, is really flippant.
>
> Hmmm,,, read the following lines:
> "Some of the program benchmarks that we have in our full benchmark
> suite tell a completely different story, putting MPIR well ahead for
> those sorts of things. They show that in an overall program, we do
> quite well."
>
> You wrote them.
>
> You used a fake argument to say that MPIR is "well ahead" of another
> project.

it wasn't a fake argument at all. Your claim was that these Core 2
benchmarks of Case's show that MPIR is only faster for multiplication
above 100000 digits and nothing else. But that is completely *false*,
(his benchmarks didn't show that at all - you lied, and his benchmarks
only included a small selection of things).

Amazing how you just *completely ignored* the next_prime benchmark he
printed (let alone the other timings that were faster). Oh, and there
just happens to be around 800 lines of new code in MPIR for the
next_prime function!

I suppose you are going to tell me you have a 10 line patch to make
that fast in GMP too, are you?

As Case checked, it returns the same answer as GMP up to
100,000,000,000. So I very much doubt we are cheating!

Come on then, out with it. Where's your 10 line patch for that one?
I'll accept it even if it only checks primality up to 64 bits! See how
generous I am!

Bill.

> Was this flippant?
> From my point of view it simply is falsehood, and a 10 lines patch
> proves it for me.
> This is not acceptable for me. Comparison between projects must be
> fair!
>
> Why should I trust you when you will say that your new algorithm is
> correct?
>
> Gian.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "mpir-devel" group.
> To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.


Reply via email to