That's interesting. We should have had, and still have the same convention as GMP. In fact, for gcdext I think we now use precisely the same code as GMP.
Can you give an example of something that has changed? Bill. On 2 October 2014 11:55, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > I noticed that the output of mpz_gcdext() was changed from MPIR-2.6.0 to > MPIR-2.7.0-alpha12. Are there now any guarantees about which values (s,t) > are returned or is it still random? It would be good to know... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mpir-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
