Dear Mr Strøm, > New to the list, I would like ask if someone has any experience with the >product Universal Translator 2000. On paper it looks promising. I obtained a copy a few years ago -- in order to see how bad it was. >How is the quality of the translation? The quality is extremely poor, and I would not recommend it.
>Can it communicate with other applications, without interaction? (ActiveX, COM ??) Perhaps, I have not tested it .. >Who owns the product? (After Languageforce went down) Nobody as far as I know. I was told that a company called Glossa was continuing to develop and/or sell it, but I have been unable to find them on the Internet. >How can one get in contact with them? Don't know >How is the quality of support? It was poor before the company ceased operation >I would also very much like to receive recommendations of other MT-packages, >preferably omnidirectional ones, beiing able to communicate with other >applications (without interaction) Which langauegs are you interesetd in? For a full listing of current commercial systems see the "Compendium of translation software" on the EAMT website. With regards, John Hutchins 16 June Øyvind Strøm < -- For MT-List info, see http://www.eamt.org/mt-list.html