No the downside is that the information wouldn't be available at all for tagging if it's in an annotation.
Cristov (wolfsong) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'MusicBrainz style discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: RE: [mb-style] LiveTrackStyle Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 14:07:06 +0200 What about implementing annotations on the track level (NATs first, but why not for other tracks as well)? I think this would be a more elegant solution to the problem where to put location, dates (or generally: categorization) of NATs. The downside is, that this information would not be easily available for tagging. g0llum > nah, i think we need every scrap of info available, because there's no > other place to store it for NAT's. info that doesn't neccesarily seem > relevant at the time of entry, might be at a later date, when the > artist's NAT section is more comprehensive. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
