"trackname (live)" should not appear on any track on any live album. the album that the track resides on tells us that it's live.
Chris Bransden wrote: > both, IMO. i don't want a non-album track with 'TrackName (live)' as > the title. but then, we also say that tracknames should be 'TrackName > (live)' if they are on an album (as this date/location can be put into > the annotation). personally i wouldn't find that useful, but i can > understand that others wouldn't want the info to be on the tags. > > however, should we ever allow track annotations, it would seem > inconsistant that the info would stay on the title NATs and be > consigned to the annotation for albums, or indeed vice versa. > > perhaps this would all be moot if annotations were copied to the > 'notes' tag field. > > On 03/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So what? We could agree on a minimal set of information to be added to the >> track name field in the database. But all this bloated information is too >> much, imho. >> The question is: Do we collect this information for the tagging, or the >> music encyclopedia aspect of the database?! >> >>> No the downside is that the information wouldn't be available >>> at all for tagging if it's in an annotation. >> _______________________________________________ >> Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
