should it be (X is a parody of Y) & (X is a parody of Z)
or X is a parody of (Y and Z)
???
On 4/4/06, derGraph <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1261
After being disappointed many times that there was no "parody" AR type,
I decided to create a trac ticket on this. It essentially suggests a
track-to-track relationship type to link parodies like
[track] is a parody of [track]
[track] was parodied on [track]
Any thoughts, objections, flamings, ...?
derGraph
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
