requesting vetos on this one. anyone? On 10/04/06, Chris Bransden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what's happening with this one? i reckon it's good to go, but there's > a discussion on the wiki people might want to read - > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType > > On 28/03/06, Don Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:30:21 +0200, Simon Reinhardt wrote: > > > > > So we can either go by how exactly artists are credited in the liner > > > notes, or we could go by what they really did. I'd say find the happy > > > medium. ;) > > > > > > Anyways, let me summarize the opinions: > > > > > > Steve thinks "recorded by" would be too ambigous and could be seen as > > > describing the performer. > > > MudCrow seems to disagree there. > > > > > > Don thinks this is a good simplification of the term. > > > Chris agrees because he thinks that's how most liner notes list it. > > > > > > Cristov and Steve both think it should be the same as "engineered by", > > > correct? > > > Thomas and Chris would differentiate there. > > > > > > My two cents: I agree with Chris. You can never know an artist so well > > > to know who did what in the production phase, the only thing you hold in > > > your hands is the booklet. And we can't require people learning lots of > > > details about the production process of music just for entering > > > relationships. We should keep it as simple as possible and that is by > > > going after what most liner notes say. > > > > Right the discussion has dribbled away. I think there is a majority of > > oppinions (but no complete consensus) for changing this to "recorded by". > > > > Does anyone want to issue a veto, saying that this should not be changed, > > because it makes MusicBrainz a worse place than it is now? > > > > If so, please speak up within the next 24 hours, or remain silent for... > > well for some time. > > > > Simon: If there is no veto, you can change the text (please make sure the > > description is informative). If it gets a veto, I will pass this on to > > Robert. > > > > DonRedman, the secretary strikes back! :-) > > > > -- > > Words that are written in CamelCase refer to WikiPages: > > Visit http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ the best MusicBrainz documentation > > around! :-) > > _______________________________________________ > > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > >
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
