I'm not sure I'm following this structure. Can you post full examples? Thanks.
Cristov (wolfsong)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Chris Bransden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Co-ProducerRelationshipType
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:06:00 +0100
request for veto!
On 25/04/06, Chris Bransden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hehe, well in that case i'd say:
> {co-} an attribute of producer
> executive producer a seperate sub type
>
> any objections? i'll update the wiki pages to suit once it's on gone thru.
>
> On 25/04/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Chris Bransden wrote:
> > > mind you, is it that much of a problem that you can select an
> > > impossible combination? people would only ever use it by accident, and
> > > if they did it can always be edited :)
> >
> > You mean allow for it by design but disallow it by guidelines and vote
> > against such combinations? Would be a solution, but personally I think not
> > even making that possible would be a cleaner solution.
> > Anyway, I think we have agreement to add both executive and co-producer,
> > right? So if we can decide for a design today, I could go and implement it.
> > :)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
