> Right now, we use the album titling scheme from > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/DiscNumberStyle. This seems "backwards" > to me, as we won't be able to easily use this Disc Number or > Album Subtitle information easily with the tagger as it is > stored in a single line with the Album Title. Shouldn't we > be storing this information (Album Subtitle and Disc Number) > in separate fields so we can easily manipulate it with newer > tagging programs? > > Many audio players, such as amaroK group albums with the same > title and separate multiple discs by the Disc Number tag. We > can't enter this information because it is part of the Album > Title string and would probably be a pain to extract. > > Anyone agree? I think we should store the Disc Number > separately, and group multiple-disc albums together using > AR's or some other method. > We may be then tempted to write Album Titles in the format "Album > Title: Album Subtitle" but I think that the Album Subtitle > should also be in a separate field (if possible). > > Comments? > > -- > -Aaron Cooper
Probably but it may be a while yet. Read the following to understand. http://blog.musicbrainz.org/archives/2006/05/future_directio.html http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/NextGenerationSchema http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ObjectModel -- Cristov (wolfsong) _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
