Ah I see, if that's the case I fall back to what I said in one of the other threads, the virtual/alternate versions linked by AR should be identical, basically for the reasons you mentioned. This virtual/alternate release AR is basically tying stuff together that would usually be merged except that the alternate provides useful text translations and we don't want huge album annotations full of translations.
Simon Reinhardt wrote: > > Kerensky97 wrote: >> And I agree with Gecks that that disclamier might be a little more than >> is >> needed; hopefully people realize that as a transl(iter)ation it should be >> identical to the other release just with different words in the tracks >> and >> title. > > I don't think that's what Gecks meant. He said it should not only be > allowed for identical tracklistings (apart from transl(iter)ation), but > also for tracklistings with bonus tracks or another track order. > Here we have to be careful. How will NGS use this relationship and how > will it use remaster relationships? Well, when we run the initial > conversion to a new schema, it will observe relationships such as remaster > and automatically create a release group in which it puts both. Apart from > that, the relationships and releases stay untouched. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-mb-style--RFC%3A-Transliterations-translations%2C-again%21-%28now-on-test.musicbrainz.org%29-tf2084745s2885.html#a5767419 Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
