2006/9/8, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Oh I wasn't implying to be consistent with them, I also think that looks ugly. ;) Just that we put it in that section.
Kay
> Now, personnaly, I would simply strip it off to the following: > " > * artist wrote liner notes on release > * release has liner notes by artist or URL > " I liked "for" more, and you surely forgot to strip off the "URL" here. ;)
* artist wrote liner notes for release * release has liner notes by artist ;)
> (b) because I can't imagine liner notes per-track (hence I think this > AR only apply to releases, not to tracks)... I have at least one album where the members of the band talk about every track in detail.
Depends then... If different authors provide separate liner notes, each for a specific track, I agree. Otherwise, the fact they talk about the tracks in one blurb doesn't make it specific to each track. And I can't help but think Liner notes is like Cover art: it belong to the release, not to tracks. But hey, I don't mind, if you think it's usefull, let's go for tracks also. - Olivier _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
