On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:28:35PM -0400, Brian Schweitzer wrote: > >I believe this is more or less the current custom, and it fits with > >the general tendency to treat japanese releases with care. > > > The main problem I see, when I find these, is there is often no easy way to > distinguish these add edits from add edits where the editor just doesn't > know what he or she is doing - especially when the artist's name also is > listed in English, as opposed to Japanese. It's somewhat confusing that > we're applying a special rule to a subset of releases, but these releases > are still being set to English/Latin.
In my experience, this is pretty rare, can you point to an example? The japanese artists which need to be treated like this will usually be in japanese, and/or some of the tracks on the album will be in kanji/kana. I think it's quite reasonable to ask for a clarification from the editor who entered the mod if you're unsure. (and obviously, non-responsive editors get no votes ;) -- kuno. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
