On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:32 PM, symphonick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, if I understood correctly when asking in another tread about > post-CSG tracknames, we should still put in the "heading" (context) in > tracknames. > From a cover (back): > Czech Suite, Op. 39 > 2 Preludium (Pastorale) > 3 Polka > Tracknames: > 2. Czech Suite, Op. 39: Preludium (Pastorale) > 3. Czech Suite, Op. 39: Polka > > Like worktitles in CSG but as it is written on the cover (my > interpretation). This would of course mean that some releases won't > have "BWV 244"...? In this case I suppose "Matthew Passion: Chorus: > Kommt, ihr Tochter, helft mir klagen; Choral: O Lamm Gottes, > unschuldig" (we have to decide what to fix in tracknames, missing > umlauts, should we standardize colons etc) > > I thought that we would be able to search for "BWV 244" in the > worklist and from there locate the "connected" releases/tracks? Quite, all this discussion will become almost meaningless then. I agree using what is printed will be the simplest solution, although we will have to address the problem of re-issues print differences. The only real showstopper for me so far for this system is if we have > to create a new "work" every time a work is split in more than one > track (4th mvt of Beethoven's 9 and similar) . Sounds like a big mess > to me. (& then there's this problem with identical releases in > different languages and/or different packaging & how to deal with that > without turning into discogs...) Fortunately, this situation is not so frequent :-) -- Frederic Da Vitoria
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
