On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Leiv Hellebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would not take me much effort to redo the SMP (and the Messiah the > only ones I've done this for). Still, I am reluctant to do so, because I > do think the adding of workname more or less breaks the primary function > of the track title: To be useful in a normal listening context (some > tracks on this release lasts only seven seconds, so there's little time > to decipher the full title and extract the part title). Ah, here is the deepest issue, I think: You see MB as a something which should be useful in a normal listening context. I consider it as a database about music (although I agree it is still embryonic). Not much about listening in my position. You see MB as a way to feed Picard which will in it's turn tag your files. I seldom listen to music when I am using MB, and I almost never watch the track titles when I listen to music. I even deliberately avoid tagging many of my mp3 because I don't want to be biased by knowledge. So if looked at the track title, all I would read would be the track number. I would still be a MB user, even if Picard did not exist, although I am glad Picard exists. -- Frederic Da Vitoria
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
