The only thing that may be a problem for me here is that I'll have to remember I must stop swapping those names since Picard will automatically use the names I want :-D
2009/3/2 Leiv Hellebo <leiv.hell...@gmail.com> > No strong opinions here :) > - Afficher le texte des messages précédents - > > Paul C. Bryan wrote: > > I interpret the word eponymous to mean anything named after a particular > > person (not just an artist lending their name to something), which would > > therefore currently include these examples of quartets named after > > deceased composers. > > > > I don't mind these quartets being sorted by their namesakes, but others > > (you?) may have a strong opinion one way or the other. If this seems too > > broad, then I suppose we may need to further constrain it. > > > > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 20:15 +0100, Leiv Hellebo wrote: > >> Paul C. Bryan wrote: > >>> Proposal: > >>> Change the last bullet of #6 in SortNameStyle to read as follows: > >>> Artist names that contain a person's name (usually eponymous band > names) > >>> sort as the person primarily, with remaining identifiers as > >>> comma-separated suffixes. Examples: "The Sensational Alex Harvey Band" > >>> has sort name "Harvey, Alex, Sensational, Band, The". "The Jimi Hendrix > >>> Experience" has sort name "Hendrix, Jimi, Experience, The". > >> Not that I mind (much), but I'd like to have clarified if you want: > >> > >> Berg, Alban, Quartet > >> Haas, Pavel, Quartet > >> > >> These two quartets were formed long after the composers were dead. > >> > >> (I am not sure how "usually eponymous band names" should be understood, > >> but perhaps it means exactly that you'd like "Berg, Alban, Quartet"?) > >> > >> Leiv > -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
