Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> Perhaps also modify it, to handle the concerns that have been raised, so
> it's something like this:
>
> --------------------
> Release Group is part of a series {{with / , the next volume in the
> series is}} Release Group
>
> Attribute: [] Next
> --------------------
I don't quite see how valuable the AR-beetwen-Releases-or-RGs approach
is as long as it cannot represent the name of the series. You would have
to use the release annotation to note that some release is part of the
"Columbia Jazz Masterpieces" as opposed to the "Columbia String Swing
Masterpieces". And what if a release was part of two series, both the
Summer Hits series and the DJ ÜberKool Remix series?
And surely one motivating factor for working on a series would be to
have a page that would gradually become more complete and goodlooking as
releases were added and where one could add interesting and geeky
annotations? For releases-in-sets we already have that: ReleaseGroups
(at least I hope they can get annotations when NGS comes). For series,
there is no good way to say that
The series 'Opening Doors', is intended by Dausgaard and the Swedish
Chamber Orchestra to explore "the limits of what a chamber orchestra is
traditionally expected to perform"
(http://www.bis.se/album_info.php?aID=BIS-SACD-1566).
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
