Brian Schweitzer wrote: > NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN RFC! :D :D > > Ok, this one's just about done. It's taken a ton of work; I know that > it's rather large (huge?), but I feel that it had to be, to cover all > the various things that have been discussed whenever the > conductor/chorusmaster problem, or other 'artist position' suggestions, > have come up in the 5 years since that problem was first raised. But > before I make the proposal, I'd really appreciate some feedback (and > some other eyes looking for nits and typos).
I think these are more interesting than the parent/sibling relations which I've never cared for, but cannot see that there is much a need for this. What useful use case(s) requested by actual users will this allow MB to support? It would be good to have a Concertmaster AR between artist and track, though. The CM/Leader/FV is sometimes credited prominently on sleeves (and I guess all orchestras need more than one CM, so you cannot deduce this information based on the CM artist-artist AR). For all I know you've proposed a CM Artist-Track/release AR already, mb-style is flooded and I am unable to keep up. I would like to follow discussions on ReleaseEvent and Work, which seems to be the only important discussions atm?, but I find this hard as there is so much noise. (Somewhere you mentioned that mb-style has much less traffic than misc dev mailing lists. The comparison is IMO meaningless.) Leiv / leivhe _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
